Improving
Student Learning
through Strategic
Compensation
A TeacherSolutions Report
from the Teacher Leaders of TLN-Kansas
July 2008
T
he Center for Teaching Quality (CTQ) launched the
TeacherSolutions model in February 2006 when a select
team of 18 highly accomplished teachers from thr
Improving
Student Learning
through Strategic
Compensation
A TeacherSolutions Report
from the Teacher Leaders of TLN-Kansas
Produced by The Center for Teaching Qual
The Center for Teaching Quality
seeks to improve student learning
and advance the teaching profession
by cultivating teacher leadership,
conducting timely research,
and crafting smart policy.
To Improving Student Learning through Strategic Compensation A TeacherSolutions Report from the Teacher Leaders of TLN-Kansas July 2008
T he Center for Teaching Quality (CTQ) launched the TeacherSolutions model in February 2006 when a select team of 18 highly accomplished teachers from thr
Improving Student Learning through Strategic Compensation A TeacherSolutions Report from the Teacher Leaders of TLN-Kansas Produced by The Center for Teaching Qual
The Center for Teaching Quality seeks to improve student learning and advance the teaching profession by cultivating teacher leadership, conducting timely research, and crafting smart policy. To
Examining the Policy Landscape M ore so than ever before, policymakers and the public believe the fate of Amer- ican public education rests with teachers. Ov
In recent years political pressure and leadership has once again emerged in support of differentiated teacher pay. In an attempt to move away from the negative feelings associated with “merit pay,” a
demic goals, reflecting on instructional practices, and collaborating with the principal on student learning — those are what teachers are now doing.” One of the key issues facing these and other pr
A New Course For Teacher Leadership And Professional Pay I n 2006, the Center for Teaching Quality (CTQ) and its Teacher Leaders Network (TLN) successfully launched the TeacherSolutions
In early fall 2007, CTQ used its suite of virtual communication tools to facilitate live webinars and ongoing email discussions with the core TLN-Kansas planning team. Thesediscussionsfocusedonthepot
Unearthing The Issues C onversations at the TLN-Kansas conference in November 2007 centered on the four pillars of compensation reform identified in the TeacherSolutio
One other concern is worth noting ... words. They are important. When describing professional pay reforms we choose to use words that can clearly define, inform, and inspire — not alienate. All too o
our school districts do not have the “lock” on sound professional development for us either. We have attended too many irrelevant or repetitious “sit and get” in-service trainings that did not improv
a difference for their students would be advantageous. Lory Mills, a kindergarten teacher from Derby, explained: “Teachers who demonstrate that they have taken what they have learned and have applie
n Teachers should continually gain new knowledge and skills. In order for this to be successful, however, they must have a prominent voice in the decision-making process. “One-size-fi
in Garden City, suggested that the system not focus on achieving a certain score, but on how much the student has improved overall, including test scores and other measures like grades, attendance, a
n Incentives for student learning must be available to all teachers, not just those teaching in the tested, core content areas; therefore, rewards for student learning should be offered to teachers
Many school districts across the United States have gotten “in the game” of rewarding teachers for traditional leadership roles. Teacher leaders may receive additional sti- pendsformentoringnovices,c
n Before teachers can be compensated as leaders, school culture must change so that administrators accept teachers as true partners in the decision-making process. n Creating incentives an
only be offered to those who have demonstrated the requisite skill set to teach in high- needs schools. To determine the unique qualifications for the targeted schools, educa- tors already employed a
Building off these valuable ideas, we recommend the following guiding principles for including market incentives in any strategic compensation system: n Strategic compensation systems should includ
To move these ideas forward we must bring more teacher leaders to the table. But how should we proceed — and which teachers should be at the table? Our colleague, Andrew Davis, of Wichita suggested:
Appendix A: TLN-Kansas Team Members Core Planning Team Andrew Davis, Wichita Ronda Hassig, Blue Valley Jarius Jones, Kansas City DeAnn Nelson, Wichita Sam Rabiola, Lawrence Marsha Ratzel, Bl
Endnotes l Johnson, S. M. (1986). Incentives for teachers: What motivates, what matters. Educational Administration Quarterly. Summer 1986. 22(3), 54-79. 2 Murnane, R. & Cohen, D. (1986,
500 Millstone Drive, Suite 102, Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 www.teachingquality.org
Zmags improved online publishingTLN Kansas
\n');
}
function onAppLoad() {
}
function onControlPanelLoad(name) {
}
function onPageLoad(pageid) {
}
function onZoomPageLoad(pageid) {
}
function onZoom(pageid, x, y) {
}
function onZoomOut(pageid) {
}
function onPageFlip(pageid, direction) {
}
function onCrop(pageid, x, y, height, width) {
}
function onTipFriend(pageid, friendmail, usermail) {
}
function onPrint(pageList) {
}
function onGetPDF() {
}
function onLinkClick(type, pageid, infoObject) {
}
This publication requires version 8 of the Flash Player It appears that you do not have Flash Player 8 installed.
Please Click Here
to download the Flash plugin.